270
14 Mar 12 at 8 pm

science:

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal. Here’s what Erwin Schrödinger actually wrote in 1935, translated from the German:

That it is in fact not impossible to express the degree and kind of blurring of all variables in one perfectly clear concept follows at once from the fact that Q.M. as a matter of fact has and uses such an instrument, the so-called wave function or psi-function, also called system vector. Much more is to be said about it further on. That it is an abstract, unintuitive mathematical construct is a scruple that almost always surfaces against new aids to thought and that carries no great message. At all events it is an imagined entity that images the blurring of all variables at every moment just as clearly and faithfully as does the classical model its sharp numerical values. Its equation of motion too, the law of its time variation, so long as the system is left undisturbed, lags not one iota, in clarity and determinacy, behind the equations of motion of the classical model. So the latter could be straight-forwardly replaced by the psi-function, so long as the blurring is confined to atomic scale, not open to direct control. In fact the function has provided quite intuitive and convenient ideas, for instance the “cloud of negative electricity” around the nucleus, etc. But serious misgivings arise if one notices that the uncertainty affects macroscopically tangible and visible things, for which the term “blurring” seems simply wrong. (…)

One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.

It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a “blurred model” for representing reality. In itself it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.

science:

Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal. Here’s what Erwin Schrödinger actually wrote in 1935, translated from the German:

That it is in fact not impossible to express the degree and kind of blurring of all variables in one perfectly clear concept follows at once from the fact that Q.M. as a matter of fact has and uses such an instrument, the so-called wave function or psi-function, also called system vector. Much more is to be said about it further on. That it is an abstract, unintuitive mathematical construct is a scruple that almost always surfaces against new aids to thought and that carries no great message. At all events it is an imagined entity that images the blurring of all variables at every moment just as clearly and faithfully as does the classical model its sharp numerical values. Its equation of motion too, the law of its time variation, so long as the system is left undisturbed, lags not one iota, in clarity and determinacy, behind the equations of motion of the classical model. So the latter could be straight-forwardly replaced by the psi-function, so long as the blurring is confined to atomic scale, not open to direct control. In fact the function has provided quite intuitive and convenient ideas, for instance the “cloud of negative electricity” around the nucleus, etc. But serious misgivings arise if one notices that the uncertainty affects macroscopically tangible and visible things, for which the term “blurring” seems simply wrong. (…)
One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.
It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a “blurred model” for representing reality. In itself it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.
 9
13 Mar 12 at 11 am

Oh dear God.

(via bigbangtheory-confessions)

Oh dear God.
 45
13 Mar 12 at 11 am

Damn straight!

(Source: cuocopuffs)

Damn straight!
 8
12 Mar 12 at 4 pm

drsheldoncooperphd:

Whoever had the audacity to open my office windows while I was evacuating my bowels this morning, permitting those pesky birds to sit on the sill, very clever. I’ll have you know, I no longer have Ornithophobia. Your malevolent act did not threaten me in any manner nor did it trigger any fears in which I would succumb to. Nice try.

Damn.

(Source: drsheldoncooperphd)

Anything good I’m missing out on?

What, oh, what to post about… Hm, well I’ve decided to take up art. If burning things with my beautiful laser, Darla, and using the remains as decorative pieces around my apartment counts as art. 

Dr. Dumbass decided he wanted to bring those godforsaken bongos to Caltech today. I can hear him playing them from my lab! Leonard suggested sound barriers, but to be absolutely honest, my hair looks pretty good today and I don’t really want to mess it up with noise canceling headphones. Then again, they’re Sheldon’s headphones. Leonard brought them to wear in the car on the way to work. Perhaps I’ll wear them around just to freak him out.

 48
28 Feb 12 at 3 pm

Hahaha, oh man this is great.

What do you think, Raj?

(Source: sovereignlightcafe)

Hahaha, oh man this is great.
What do you think, Raj?

Working in an environment where Leonard likes to come in, while I’m making my flash frozen bananas, and melt his toys when he’s pissed off is just too much for a salary such as mine.

 1
27 Feb 12 at 2 pm

Asked by Anonymous

asker Do you secretly have a crush on Sheldon? You seem awfully obsessed with him...

Am I awfully obsessed with bursting his bubble? Yes. Am I awfully obsessed with HIM? Hell no.